/var/www/dpr_slims_baru/lib/SearchEngine/SearchBiblioEngine.php:687 "Search Engine Debug 🔎 🪲"
Engine Type ⚙️: "SLiMS\SearchEngine\SearchBiblioEngine"
SQL ⚙️: array:2 [ "count" => "select count(sb.biblio_id) from search_biblio as sb where sb.opac_hide=0 and ((match (sb.author) against (:author in boolean mode)))" "query" => "select sb.biblio_id, sb.title, sb.author, sb.topic, sb.image, sb.isbn_issn, sb.publisher, sb.publish_place, sb.publish_year, sb.labels, sb.input_date, sb.edition, sb.collation, sb.series_title, sb.call_number from search_biblio as sb where sb.opac_hide=0 and ((match (sb.author) against (:author in boolean mode))) order by sb.last_update desc limit 20 offset 0" ]
Bind Value ⚒️: array:1 [ ":author" => "'+\"George Tsebelis\"'" ]
Political scientists have long classified systems of government as parliementery or presidential, two party or multiparty, and so on. But such distinctions often fail to provide useful insights. For exemple, how are we to compare the United States, a presidential bicameral regime with two weak parties, to Denmark, a perliementary unicameral regime with many stronge parties? Veto Players advanceā¦